Crypto and Stock Market , Business and Finance

Bitcoin Price Crash After Israel-Iran Conflict: What the Charts Predicted

While geopolitical news provided the spark, the technical setup determined the size and speed of Bitcoin’s sell-off.

21 Jan, 2025

Introduction

The recent escalation in hostilities between Israel and Iran sent shockwaves through global financial markets and triggered a sharp sell-off in Bitcoin, the world’s leading cryptocurrency. Prior to the conflict, technical analysis had already flagged key warning signs on Bitcoin’s charts, signaling a likely correction even before news of airstrikes and missile launches dominated headlines. In this expanded report, we delve into the precise chart formations that foreshadowed the downturn, outline the timeline of geopolitical events, examine Bitcoin’s intra-day and multi-day price behavior, and draw actionable lessons for traders and investors.

Timeline of the Israel-Iran Escalation

June 12, 2025

Rising diplomatic tensions surface as Israeli intelligence warns of potential Iranian nuclear facility enhancements near Natanz.

June 13, 2025

Israel conducts pre-emptive airstrikes on suspected uranium enrichment sites in Natanz and military installations around Tehran.

June 14–15, 2025

Iran retaliates with coordinated drone and missile strikes targeting Israeli outposts in the Negev Desert, heightening fears of a broader Middle East conflict.

June 16, 2025

Global risk assets tumble. Bitcoin plummets from $108,500 to a low of $102,664, erasing over $1.16 billion in leveraged positions during one of its most volatile trading sessions of the year.

June 17, 2025

Reports of back-channel de-escalation lead to partial market recovery; Bitcoin rebounds above $106,000 amid renewed institutional inflows.

Bitcoin’s Price Dynamics During the Crisis

Bitcoin’s reaction to geopolitical shocks often unfolds in two phases: an immediate risk-off sell-off followed by a rebound as liquidity returns. Below is a detailed daily breakdown of price action around the spike in hostilities:


Date

Opening Price

Intraday High

Intraday Low

Closing Price

% Change

Notes

Jun 13, 2025

$108,120

$108,500

$103,000

$103,000

–4.78%

Sharp decline on news of Israeli airstrikes.

Jun 14, 2025

$103,000

$105,200

$102,600

$102,900

–0.10%

Continued downside amid Iranian missile response.

Jun 15, 2025

$102,900

$106,900

$104,000

$106,500

+3.50%

Technical buyers step in, fueled by ETF inflows.

Jun 16, 2025

$106,500

$107,000

$102,664

$103,500

–2.83%

One of the highest liquidation days, with significant long position unwinds.

Jun 17, 2025

$103,500

$110,000

$105,000

$109,800

+6.08%

Market stabilizes as de-escalation talks emerge.


Each session illustrates a classic risk-off reaction—initial capitulation followed by opportunistic buying once extreme fear subsided.

Technical Chart Patterns That Rang the Alarm

1. Bearish Shark Harmonic Pattern

In early June, a Bearish Shark harmonic pattern matured on the 4-hour Bitcoin chart, with Fibonacci ratios aligning at the 0.886 retracement of the initial XA leg. Such patterns historically precede swift reversals when confirmed by volume spikes, as traders recognize full harmonic cycles and book profits.

2. Breakdown Below Value Area High

Using Volume Profile analysis, Bitcoin had been consolidating near its Value Area High (VAH), the price level encompassing 70 percent of traded volume during a reference period. On June 13, price decisively broke below this anchor, triggering algorithmic sell signals and accelerating the downturn.

3. RSI Bearish Divergence

On the weekly Relative Strength Index (RSI), Bitcoin’s price peaked near $112,000 without corresponding RSI highs, forming a clear bearish divergence. Divergences of this nature indicate waning bullish momentum and often precede corrections as momentum fails to keep pace with price.

4. Rising Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL)

Glassnode’s NUPL metric, which measures unrealized profit versus loss among holders, surged above 0.75 in early June—levels historically associated with elevated profit-taking risk. When NUPL enters the “euphoria” zone, long-term holders tend to cash out, exacerbating downside pressure.

Geopolitical Risk Meets Crypto Volatility

Bitcoin’s behavior during geopolitical crises has been studied extensively:

1. Risk-Asset Correlation

In short-term windows, Bitcoin typically moves in tandem with equities, falling on risk-off news before decoupling and rebounding once volatility subsides.

2. Safe-Haven Debate

While digital-gold proponents posit Bitcoin as a disaster hedge, empirical evidence shows it seldom acts as a haven during initial shocks but can outperform traditional assets in the recovery phase.

3. Institutional Accumulation

Past instances—such as the 2019 U.S.–Iran tensions following the Soleimani strike—revealed that institutions like MicroStrategy and Grayscale continued accruing Bitcoin during dips, underpinning support around major psychological levels.

4. Post-Event Runs

Following previous Middle East escalations, Bitcoin often recorded 20–30 percent rallies within 30–60 days post-event as macro risk perceptions normalized and liquidity providers reentered.

Advanced Risk Management Strategies

Professional traders and institutions employed several tactics to navigate the storm:

1. Dynamic Stop-Losses

Moving stop-loss orders in line with key chart levels—such as below the 50-day moving average or the recent swing low—helped lock in profits while allowing room for volatility.

2. Scaled Positioning

Rather than outright liquidation, many scaled out of long positions in tranches as price approached Fibonacci resistance zones, thereby avoiding complete market exit.

3. Hedging with Options

Put spreads and protective collars on BTC options provided defined risk, allowing holders to cushion downside while retaining upside exposure if the conflict de-escalated.

4. Cross-Asset Diversification

Allocating a portion of crypto portfolios to gold-backed tokens or stablecoins reduced overall correlation risk and preserved capital during intense drawdowns.

What Traders Learned

1. Integrate Multiple Indicators

Relying on a single signal can produce false alerts; combining harmonic patterns, volume profiles, RSI, and NUPL enhanced signal reliability.

2. Follow Volume Anchors

Breaches of Value Areas often trigger algorithmic flows; monitoring Volume Profile zones can offer early exit or entry cues.

3. Monitor Sentiment Extremes

Extreme NUPL and RSI readings flagged elevated emotion and profit-taking risk before the headline event.

4. Stay Informed on News Catalysts

Real-time tracking of geopolitical developments aligned chart-based signals with news triggers, reducing reaction time and emotional bias.

Conclusion

The June 2025 Israel-Iran conflict acted as the catalyst for a multi-day Bitcoin downturn, but chart analysis had already sketched the correction’s trajectory days earlier. A Bearish Shark harmonic, a breakdown below the Value Area High, a bearish RSI divergence, and elevated NUPL readings converged to signal heightened downside risk. While geopolitical news provided the spark, the technical setup determined the size and speed of Bitcoin’s sell-off. By synthesizing diverse indicators and staying attuned to real-time news flow, traders can better navigate crypto’s volatile reaction to global events and transform potential crises into structured opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: Could the crash have been predicted solely on charts?

While chart patterns flagged a probable correction, no technical signal is infallible. The confluence of multiple indicators—including the Shark harmonic, VAH breakdown, RSI divergence, and NUPL extremes—provided a high-probability scenario rather than certainty.

Q2: Why didn’t Bitcoin act as a safe haven initially?

Bitcoin’s limited correlation data and relatively smaller market depth versus gold and bonds cause it to mirror broader risk-off flows in the first hours of a crisis, only decoupling once macro liquidity is restored.

Q3: What tools can new traders use to spot such signals?

Platforms like TradingView offer built-in Fibonacci, harmonic pattern, RSI, and volume profile indicators. Glassnode and Santiment deliver on-chain sentiment metrics like NUPL to complement price-based analysis.

Q4: How can investors prepare for future geopolitical shocks?

Maintain a balanced portfolio, apply dynamic risk limits, and pre-define hedging strategies via options. Regularly backtest chart setups against past events to calibrate indicator thresholds.

Q5: Will Bitcoin’s long-term outlook remain intact?

Long-term fundamentals—network adoption, protocol upgrades like Taproot, and institutional integration—persist as primary growth drivers. Short-term drawdowns often serve as correction phases within larger bull cycles.

Disclaimer 

Created with the help of advanced AI tools and deep research, this article is designed to answer your questions and provide meaningful insights. The information has been thoroughly checked for relevance and accuracy to help you make informed decisions.

Thank you for reading — stay informed and inspired!


0 Comments

Leave A Comment